Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]
RE: Report on Wood Diaphragm Issues
[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]- To: <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
- Subject: RE: Report on Wood Diaphragm Issues
- From: "Mark E. Deardorff" <MarkD(--nospam--at)DandDEng.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2000 15:55:59 -0800
Raise your fee! Sorry, but what else can you do? If a building official is that stupid and fearful than you are pretty much screwed from the start. Mark E. Deardorff, SE Deardorff & Deardorff, Inc. Ramona, CA 92065 > -----Original Message----- > From: ken [mailto:ken(--nospam--at)ffia.net] > Sent: Monday, January 03, 2000 12:19 PM > To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org > Subject: Re: Report on Wood Diaphragm Issues > > > Tim McCormick the Building Official at the City of Santa > Monica wants a > Rigidity Analysis (1630.6) and a Story Drift Analysis > (1630.10) for a one > story residence no matter what Seaoc or LA City says. I used > the Simplified > Design Base Shear Method. A lot of Mr. McCormick's > information comes from a > SEAOC Seminar, Wood Diaphragms and Shear Wall Defections,.authored by > Douglas Thompson S.E. in which is stated "Past earthquakes > have shown that > lateral forces are distributed by relative rigidities." > > I would appreciate any help and how to handle this situation? > > Ken Wilkinson S.E. > > >
- References:
- Re: Report on Wood Diaphragm Issues
- From: ken
- Re: Report on Wood Diaphragm Issues
- Prev by Subject: Re: Report on Wood Diaphragm Issues
- Next by Subject: Re: Report on Wood Diaphragm Issues
- Previous by thread: Re: Report on Wood Diaphragm Issues
- Next by thread: Re: Report on Wood Diaphragm Issues
- About this archive
- Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]