Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]
Re: Report on Wood Diaphragm Issues
[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]- To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
- Subject: Re: Report on Wood Diaphragm Issues
- From: Shafat Qazi <seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
- Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2000 16:43:37 -0800
Ken:This subject is very hot. It is my understanding the SEAOC is now taking a position to "Exempt" single family dwellings from Rigid diaphragm analysis.
Tim McCormick is one of the few building officials that has impressed me. He is very knowledgeable on this subject. He is also open to new ideas. I am sure he will consider the current SEAOC position on this issue.
Last but not the least, you may want to include rigid diaphragm analysis just to cover yourself from future law suits. What SEAOC says does not matter in the court. What matters is what the building code says.
That is 1 cent worth. Shafat At 01/03/00 12:18 PM, you wrote:
Tim McCormick the Building Official at the City of Santa Monica wants a Rigidity Analysis (1630.6) and a Story Drift Analysis (1630.10) for a one story residence no matter what Seaoc or LA City says. I used the Simplified Design Base Shear Method. A lot of Mr. McCormick's information comes from a SEAOC Seminar, Wood Diaphragms and Shear Wall Defections,.authored by Douglas Thompson S.E. in which is stated "Past earthquakes have shown that lateral forces are distributed by relative rigidities." I would appreciate any help and how to handle this situation? Ken Wilkinson S.E. ----- Original Message ----- From: <RShreenan(--nospam--at)aol.com> To: <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org> Sent: Saturday, December 11, 1999 1:05 PM Subject: Report on Wood Diaphragm Issues > I just received this e-mail. It looks like Dennis's long, hard fought battle > is producing some encouraging results. My hat is off to Dennis and others > who have pursued this issue and my thanks to Ron Hamburger and others on the > Seismology Committee that responded. > > In this business it is hard to find time to get involved in complex issues > when one doesen't fully understand them. I find it necessary to attend more > seminars each year just to keep up with new code changes materials and > methodology. When business is good you have to make hay while the sun is > shining.------My excuses. > > I hope that this latest report on diaphragms will be accepted by plan check > agencies > on the intermin until the prescribed code changes are made official. > > From one of the many silent observers, > Ray Shreenan > >
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: Report on Wood Diaphragm Issues
- From: SEConsultant
- Re: Report on Wood Diaphragm Issues
- From: ken
- RE: Report on Wood Diaphragm Issues
- References:
- Re: Report on Wood Diaphragm Issues
- From: ken
- Re: Report on Wood Diaphragm Issues
- Prev by Subject: RE: Report on Wood Diaphragm Issues
- Next by Subject: RE: Report on Wood Diaphragm Issues
- Previous by thread: RE: Report on Wood Diaphragm Issues
- Next by thread: RE: Report on Wood Diaphragm Issues
- About this archive
- Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]