Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]
97 ubc
[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]- To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
- Subject: 97 ubc
- From: KTarlow(--nospam--at)aol.com
- Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2000 12:04:29 EST
Dear Steve, Thanx responding so quickly. In my example we have a frame (cantivered steel columns) on the lower floor and plywood shearwalls on the upper floors. When considering regidies the plywood walls may deflect 1/8" while the frame will deflect .8 inches under similar loading. The lower floor is therefore more flexible. Rigid Frames are a more flexible system than a shear wall system. We therfore have a fleable system supporting a rigid system (soft story). I would like to find away around this penalty on cntilevered columns, and if I could am overlooking something I would like to believe I could use section 1630.4.2. Please read C105.3.1 page 127 of the 1996 Blue Book Please reply Thanx Ken Tarlow
- About this archive
- Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]