Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]
3x_ versus (2)-2x_
[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]- To: <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
- Subject: 3x_ versus (2)-2x_
- From: "Jeff Creagan" <jeffc(--nospam--at)kpff.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 20:02:17 -0800
|
A common request by contractors is can they
substitute (2)-2x_ for the 3x_ studs we specify heavily nailed shear walls and
bearing studs in the lower levels of multi-story buildings (here in Seattle, 5
story wood-framed structures are permitted) so long as the studs are spiked
together adequately to ensure shear transfer at panel edges.
Opinions?
|
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 3x_ versus (2)-2x_
- From: Jake Watson
- Re: 3x_ versus (2)-2x_
- Prev by Subject: 2000 SEAOC Convention - Call for Abstracts
- Next by Subject: RE: 3x_ versus (2)-2x_
- Previous by thread: RE: Errata I to Vol. I Seismic Design Manual
- Next by thread: Re: 3x_ versus (2)-2x_
- About this archive
- Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]