Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]
Re: 3x_ versus (2)-2x_
[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]- To: jeffc(--nospam--at)kpff.com, seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
- Subject: Re: 3x_ versus (2)-2x_
- From: Rhkratzse(--nospam--at)aol.com
- Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 00:26:58 EST
I'm curious, Jeff, how heavy are your "heavily nailed shear walls"? How much double-stud nailing would be required? What are the chances that all of this nailing will be properly completed? Will the 2x studs take all these nails into 2 faces without expiring (AKA splitting)? Ralph Hueston Kratz, S.E. Richmond CA USA In a message dated 1/25/00 7:58:24 PM, jeffc(--nospam--at)kpff.com writes: << A common request by contractors is can they substitute (2)-2x_ for the 3x_ studs we specify heavily nailed shear walls and bearing studs in the lower levels of multi-story buildings (here in Seattle, 5 story wood-framed structures are permitted) so long as the studs are spiked together adequately to ensure shear transfer at panel edges. Opinions? >>
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: 3x_ versus (2)-2x_
- From: SEConsultant
- RE: 3x_ versus (2)-2x_
- Prev by Subject: Re: 3x_ versus (2)-2x_
- Next by Subject: RE: 3x_ versus (2)-2x_
- Previous by thread: Re: 3x_ versus (2)-2x_
- Next by thread: RE: 3x_ versus (2)-2x_
- About this archive
- Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]