Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]
Re: 3x_ versus (2)-2x_
[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]- To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
- Subject: Re: 3x_ versus (2)-2x_
- From: Jake Watson <jwatson(--nospam--at)inconnect.com>
- Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2000 09:05:03 -0700
> Jeff Creagan wrote: > > A common request by contractors is can they substitute (2)-2x_ for the > 3x_ studs we specify heavily nailed shear walls and bearing studs in > the lower levels of multi-story buildings (here in Seattle, 5 story > wood-framed structures are permitted) so long as the studs are spiked > together adequately to ensure shear transfer at panel edges. > Opinions? Another question, if I design the A.B.'s for double the force (or half stress) I can use 2x's below 600 plf. What do you do with the wall above on a two story residence? There is no anchor bolts, so is 2x ok up to 600 plf? Jake Watson, E.I.T. Salt Lake City, UT
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: 3x_ versus (2)-2x_
- From: SEConsultant
- RE: 3x_ versus (2)-2x_
- References:
- 3x_ versus (2)-2x_
- From: Jeff Creagan
- 3x_ versus (2)-2x_
- Prev by Subject: Re: 3x_ versus (2)-2x_
- Next by Subject: RE: 3x_ versus (2)-2x_
- Previous by thread: 3x_ versus (2)-2x_
- Next by thread: RE: 3x_ versus (2)-2x_
- About this archive
- Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]