Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]
'English' v Metric
[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]- To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
- Subject: 'English' v Metric
- From: MKnight <MKnight(--nospam--at)Lindapter.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2000 16:55:52 -0000
Here in the UK the engineering industry has been using the metric SI system for over 30 years. Although most of the structural sections manufactured by Corus (the new name for British Steel) continue to be soft metric conversions of sizes from yesteryear! As previous correspondents have mentioned it certainly takes time to get used to the 'other' system. However the metric system using base 10 does seem to be the easiest and most logical. I have recently been working on the technical parts of a new US catalogue for the company I work for. Being limited to converting metric dimensions to inch sizes with a maximum fraction of 1/16" isn't easy. However, I did notice fractions in the LRFD (volume 1 section 1 page 141) that I personally think are ridiculous ie.2 65/128". Does anyone actually work to these kind of figures? Obviously the use of the metric system, in this instance 63.7mm, would be a little easier for me to understand. Regards Mick mknight(--nospam--at)lindapter.com
- Prev by Subject: Re: "R" Value for Cross Bracing
- Next by Subject: Re: 'English' v Metric
- Previous by thread: Re: ENGLISH VS. METRIC
- Next by thread: Re: 'English' v Metric
- About this archive
- Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]